首页> 外文OA文献 >Radiance and Jacobian Intercomparison of Radiative Transfer Models Applied to HIRS and AMSU Channels
【2h】

Radiance and Jacobian Intercomparison of Radiative Transfer Models Applied to HIRS and AMSU Channels

机译:应用于HIRS和AMSU通道的辐射传递模型的辐射度和雅可比比对

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The goals of this study are the evaluation of current fast radiative transfer models (RTMs) and line-by-line (LBL) models. The intercomparison focuses on the modeling of 11 representative sounding channels routinely used at numerical weather prediction centers: seven HIRS (High-resolution Infrared Sounder) and four AMSU (Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit) channels. Interest in this topic was evidenced by the participation of 24 scientists from 16 institutions. An ensemble of 42 diverse atmospheres was used and results compiled for 19 infrared models and 10 microwave models, including several LBL RTMs. For the first time, not only radiances, but also Jacobians (of temperature, water vapor, and ozone) were compared to various LBL models for many channels. In the infrared, LBL models typically agree to within 0.05-0.15 K (standard deviation) in terms of top-of-the-atmosphere brightness temperature (BT). Individual differences up to 0.5 K still exist, systematic in some channels, and linked to the type of atmosphere in others. The best fast models emulate LBL BTs to within 0.25 K, but no model achieves this desirable level of success for all channels. The ozone modeling is particularly challenging. In the microwave, fast models generally do quite well against the LBL model to which they were tuned. However significant differences were noted among LBL models. Extending the intercomparison to the Jacobians proved very useful in detecting subtle and more obvious modeling errors. In addition, total and single gas optical depths were calculated, which provided additional insight on the nature of differences. Recommendations for future intercomparisons are suggested.
机译:这项研究的目标是评估当前的快速辐射传输模型(RTM)和逐行(LBL)模型。此次比对的重点是在数值天气预报中心常规使用的11个代表性探测通道的建模:七个HIRS(高分辨率红外探测仪)和四个AMSU(先进微波探测单元)通道。来自16个机构的24位科学家的参与证明了对该主题的兴趣。使用了42种不同气氛的集合,并针对19个红外模型和10个微波模型(包括多个LBL RTM)汇总了结果。这是第一次,不仅辐射,而且雅各布主义者(温度,水蒸气和臭氧的雅各布主义者)都与许多渠道的各种LBL模型进行了比较。在红外中,LBL模型通常在最高大气亮度温度(BT)的范围内在0.05-0.15 K(标准偏差)内。仍然存在高达0.5 K的个体差异,在某些渠道中存在系统性差异,而在其他渠道中则与大气类型有关。最好的快速模型将LBL BT仿真到0.25 K以内,但是没有模型能在所有通道上达到这种理想的成功水平。臭氧建模特别具有挑战性。在微波中,快速模型通常与它们所调谐到的LBL模型相比表现良好。但是,在LBL模型之间发现了显着差异。将可比性扩展到雅可比矩阵被证明对检测细微和更明显的建模错误非常有用。此外,还计算了总气体深度和单一气体光学深度,从而提供了有关差异性质的更多见解。建议将来进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号